Main Article Content

Abstract

 


The purpose of this study is to validate the Well-Being (WB) measurement instrument using confirmatory factor analysis. Instrument validation aims to ensure that the items are able to accurately reflect the WB to be measured. The instrument used in this study is an instrument developed by Riff, with a total of 42 questions covering 6 aspects of WB. A quantitative descriptive approach was used in this study, involving 284 PGSD STKIP PGRI Pacitan students as respondents. Instrument validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Three types of validity were calculated, namely construct, convergent, and discriminant validity. The results of the analysis show that construct validity is met with an RMSEA value of 0.78 and a GFI of 0.908, by issuing 18 questions because it has a low factor loading. Furthermore, convergent validity shows that two aspects, namely Positive Relations and Environmental Mastery, have an AVE value of less than 0.5. Finally, discriminant validity is met with no indication of multicollinearity in the questions used. From these results it can be concluded that the WB instrument that can be used consists of 24 questions, with each aspect consisting of 4 items.

Keywords

construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, Well-Being validitas konstruk, validitas konvergen, validitas diskriminan, Well-Being

Article Details

How to Cite
Purnamasari, M. I. (2023). Analisis Validitas Konstruk, Konvergen, dan Diskriminan dari Instrument Well-Being. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 15(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.21137/jpp.2023.15.1.6

References

  1. Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7
  2. Awang, Z. (2012). A handbook on SEM 2nd Edition. In A Handbook on SEM (Issue X).
  3. Barbayannis, G., Bandari, M., Zheng, X., Baquerizo, H., Pecor, K. W., & Ming, X. (2022). Academic Stress and Mental Well-Being in College Students: Correlations, Affected Groups, and COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886344
  4. Compas, B. E., Wagner, B. M., Slavin, L. A., & Vannatta, K. (1986). A prospective study of life events, social support, and psychological symptomatology during the transition from high school to college. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911173
  5. Feller, S. C., Castillo, E. G., Greenberg, J. M., Abascal, P., Van Horn, R., & Wells, K. B. (2018). Emotional Well-Being and Public Health: Proposal for a Model National Initiative. Public Health Reports, 133(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918754540
  6. Freire, C., Ferradás, M. D. M., Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., & Vallejo, G. (2016). Profiles of Psychological Well-being and Coping Strategies among University Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01554
  7. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis, Multivariate Data Analysis. In Multivariate Data Analysis.
  8. Hiester, M., Nordstrom, A., & Swenson, L. M. (2009). Stability and Change in Parental Attachment and Adjustment Outcomes During the First Semester Transition to College Life. Journal of College Student Development, 50(5), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0089
  9. Kovich, M. K., & Simpson, V. L. (2019). Well-being and College Success of Undergraduate Students. Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal, 3(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.18061/bhac.v3i2.7102
  10. Margraf, J., Zhang, X. C., Lavallee, K. L., & Schneider, S. (2020). Longitudinal prediction of positive and negative mental health in Germany, Russia, and China. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0234997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234997
  11. Park, S. Y., Andalibi, N., Zou, Y., Ambulkar, S., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2020). Understanding Students’ Mental Well-Being Challenges on a University Campus: Interview Study. JMIR Formative Research, 4(3), e15962. https://doi.org/10.2196/15962
  12. Posit team. (2023). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. http://www.posit.co/
  13. R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  14. Report., N. (2018). . Emotional Well-Being: Emerging Insights and Questions for Future Research.
  15. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  16. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
  17. Schofield, M. J., O’halloran, P., Mclean, S. A., Forrester‐knauss, C., & Paxton, S. J. (2016). Depressive Symptoms Among Australian University Students: Who Is at Risk? Australian Psychologist, 51(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12129
  18. Simanjuntak, J. G. L. L., Prasetio, C. E., Tanjung, F. Y., & Triwahyuni, A. (2021). Psychological Well-Being Sebagai Prediktor Tingkat Kesepian Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 11(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v11n2.p158-175
  19. Susanto, H. P., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Kalibrasi Instrumen Literasi Matematika Siswa Menggunakan IRT dan Aplikasinya untuk Estimasi Skor. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v13i01.23135
  20. Tang, Y.-Y., Tang, R., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Promoting Psychological Well-Being Through an Evidence-Based Mindfulness Training Program. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00237
  21. Udhayakumar, P., & Illango, P. (2018). A Study on Psychological Well-Being among College Students. Journal of Social Work Education and Practice, 3(2), 79–89.