Publication Ethics
Commitment to ethical publication applies to all parties involved in the publication process of the Edumatic journal, including authors, editors, peer-reviewers, and publishers.
A. Publication and Writing
- All manuscripts submitted through the blind peer-review process involve at least two reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
- The peer-review process evaluates the significance and contribution of the manuscript in the field of education, especially in mathematics education, as well as its originality and relevance.
- Possible decisions regarding the manuscript include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
- If authors are asked to revise and resubmit the manuscript, there is no guarantee of automatic acceptance upon resubmission.
- Rejected manuscripts will not undergo further review processes.
- Submitted manuscripts are subject to legal requirements, including those related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
- A manuscript cannot be published in more than one publication.
- Edumatic Journal ensures academic freedom for editors and peer-reviewers in carrying out their responsibilities.
- Edumatic Journal is responsible for maintaining confidentiality, protecting intellectual property, and respecting copyright.
B. Author's Responsibilities
- Authors are responsible for submitting their work honestly, ensuring it is free from plagiarism and data manipulation.
- Authors must confirm that the submitted manuscript has not been previously published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- Authors must accurately cite and reference the opinions and works of others.
- If errors are found in the published manuscript, authors are obligated to promptly inform the editor.
- Authors are required to follow the applicable peer-review process.
- Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest related to the published manuscript to the editor.
- Authors must agree to editorial modifications that do not alter the core and substance of the manuscript.
C. Editor's Responsibilities
- The suitability of manuscripts for publication is determined by the editorial team during editorial board meetings.
- The editorial team is responsible for the content and overall quality of the publication.
- The editorial team cannot change decisions without valid and substantial reasons, including decisions made by previous editors.
- The editorial team ensures the confidentiality of reviewer identities.
- Manuscripts accepted by the editorial team are based on originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal's publication scope.
- The editorial team ensures that manuscripts adhere to internationally accepted publication ethics.
- All submitted manuscripts are treated fairly by the editorial team.
- The editorial team has the right to take legal action if a manuscript is found to violate publication ethics.
- The editorial team does not discriminate based on race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political ideology of the authors during the review and publication decision-making process.
- Information related to submitted manuscripts is kept confidential by the editorial team.
- Unpublished manuscripts will be returned to the authors by the editorial team.
D. Reviewer's Responsibilities
- Reviewers are required to maintain the confidentiality of information related to the manuscripts they review.
- Reviewers must respect the intellectual freedom and independence of the authors.
- Reviewers must provide input, suggestions, and comments on each manuscript with objectivity and fairness.
- Reviewers have the freedom to clearly state their opinions and support them with relevant arguments.
- Reviewers have the right to report to the editor-in-chief any similarities they find between the reviewed manuscript and other works.
- Reviewers are not allowed to review manuscripts if they have conflicts of interest due to special relationships with the authors, institutions, or companies associated with the authors.