Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the adversity quotient (high, medium, and low) on students' metacognitive abilities. This is an ex post facto study with a quantitative approach. The sample for this study was 76 students in class X of Kebonagung State Vocational School, taken with the Simple Random Sampling technique. Data collection techniques in this study use questionnaires and tests. Questionnaires are used to measure students' adversity quotients, and tests are used to measure metacognitive abilities on trigonometric material. The data analysis technique in this study uses a non-parametric test, namely the Kuskall-Wallis H. Based on the calculation results using a non-parametric test (Kuskall Wallis H) and obtaining sig. = 0.329> = 0.05, then  is accepted. This means that there is no difference between adversity quotient (high, low, low) and students' metacognitive abilities. whereas based on then  is accepted. This means that there is no difference between adversity quotient (high, low, low) and students' metacognitive abilities. This shows that adversity quotient (high, medium, low) has no effect or effect on students' metacognitive abilities.

Keywords

Adversity Quotient, Kemampuan Metakognitif, Matematika; Adversity Quotient, Metacognitive Ability, Mathematics

Article Details

How to Cite
Lestari, Y. D. (2024). Pengaruh adversity quotient terhadap kemampuan metakognitif siswa kelas x SMKN Kebonagung. JURNAL EDUMATIC, 5(2), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.21137/edumatic.v5i2.1156

References

  1. Alkadrie, R. P., Mirza, A., & Hamdani. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Level Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pertidaksamaan Kuadrat di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4(12), 1-13.
  2. Darmawan, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif . Bandung: PT REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.
  3. Dipha, R. R., & Sutirna. (2022). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa di SMA Negeri 5 Karawang. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 4(1), 51-57.
  4. Ibrahim, A., Alang, A. H., Madi, Baharuddin, Ahmad, M. A., & Darmawati. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian. Makasar: Gunadarma Ilmu.
  5. Lestari, W., Selvia, F., & Layliyyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa:Alternatif Pembelajaran di Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal At-Ta'lim, 5(2), 93-106.
  6. Muhid, A. (2019). Analisis Statistik 5 Langkah Praktis Analisis Statistik dengan SPSS for Windows. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara.
  7. Mulyani, E., Wahyuningsih, S., & Natalliasari, I. (2019). Adversity Quotient Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika dan Keterkaitannya dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif. Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 119-130.
  8. Nurfitriyanti, M., Rosa, N. M., & Nursa'adah, F. P. (2020). Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kritias, Adversity Quotient, dan Locus of Control Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. JKPM: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 263-272.
  9. Panggayuh, V. (2017). Pengaruh Kemampuan Metakognitif Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Pemrograman Dasar. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajran Informatika), 02(01), 20-25.
  10. Patria, T. M., & J.Silaen, S. M. (2020). Hubungan Self Esteem dan Adversity Quotient dengan Kemandirian Belajar pada Siswa Kelas X di MAN 20 Jakarta Timur. Jurnal IKRA-ITH Humaniora, 4(1), 24-37.
  11. Rachmat, N., Minggi, I., & Bernard. (2021). Pengaruh Emotional Quotient dan Adversity Quotient Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Peserta didik Kelas XI SMA. IMED: Issues in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 119-126.